Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for POSTY'S, serial 99246611, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
POSTY'SSerial 99246611 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Cottonwood Canyon Holdings, LLC
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Jun 22, 2025
The record shows that POSTY’S is a pending application on the Principal Register owned by Cottonwood Canyon Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The mark covers a range of goods and services, including ornamental lapel pins, key chains, paper goods such as stationery and stickers, beverage‑related items like insulated sleeve holders and mugs, a variety of clothing items, retail gift shop operations, night club entertainment services, and restaurant and bar services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of these areas, especially where the goods or services overlap with the listed categories. This record does not grant control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the specific goods and services listed. The prosecution history shows a standard examination sequence, with a notice of allowance issued on December 16, 2025 and a first request for extension of time to file a Statement of Use granted on June 8, 2026. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk of conflict in the listed goods and services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.