Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NEXTIVA GPT, serial 99252672, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NEXTIVA GPTSerial 99252672 · Principal Register
Pending · Opposition Pending
Owner: Nextiva, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jun 25, 2025
The record shows that “NEXTIVA GPT” is a pending trademark owned by Nextiva, Inc., a Delaware corporation, filed on June 25 2025 on an intent‑to‑use basis. The mark is listed on the Principal Register and is currently in opposition after publication, with the latest status update on February 18 2026. The goods and services covered are downloadable computer software that uses artificial intelligence to respond to queries or perform automated actions within unified communication and customer experience platforms, and the same AI‑powered services offered as software‑as‑a‑service. Because the opposition is still pending, the mark is not yet enforceable, but the record does establish a potential concern for any use of the name “NEXTIVA GPT” in the same or closely related AI‑based communication software or SaaS services. No enforcement actions, cancellations, or abandonments appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the closest record‑based concern lies in the AI‑driven communication software and SaaS space, and the pending opposition means the mark’s status could change.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.