Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLOR'ISH FLOWERS, serial 99321619, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLOR'ISH FLOWERSSerial 99321619 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Stephanie Alvarez
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Aug 05, 2025
The record shows that the application for FLOR'ISH FLOWERS (Serial 99321619) was filed by Stephanie Alvarez as an intent‑to‑use service mark on August 5, 2025, but it was abandoned on April 9, 2026 because the applicant failed to respond to a non‑final Office action. The only goods listed are “floral design services” in International Class 044, which covers medical and beauty services; a similar name used for those services would be the closest area of concern, while uses in unrelated categories (for example, clothing or food) fall farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “FLOR’ISH” or “FLOWERS.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply tracks the examiner’s non‑final action and the subsequent abandonment notice. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan a floral‑design business under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.