Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MEANT TO FLOURISH, serial 99333519, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MEANT TO FLOURISHSerial 99333519 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Armentria J Favors
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Aug 12, 2025
The record shows a live, pending application for the mark MEANT TO FLOURISH owned by individual Armentria J Favors, filed on August 12, 2025 and currently on the Principal Register. The goods and services listed span four classes: Class 016 covers various art prints and printed reproductions; Class 025 includes a full range of clothing for adults and children such as hooded sweatshirts, shirts, pants, shoes and pajamas; Class 041 covers online informational content about nature‑inspired art, leisure activities, homestead crafts and mindful outdoor pursuits; and Class 044 provides information about flower gardening and farming. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of those areas, especially for printed art, apparel, or the specified informational services, because the record’s protection is limited to those descriptions. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “MEANT TO FLOURISH.” The most recent meaningful event is the issuance of a Notice of Allowance on March 24, 2026, which now requires a Statement of Use or an extension within six months. The prosecution history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a similar name for art prints, clothing, or related online content.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.