Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SMOKE N LOCAL [email protected] 914-588-6544, serial 99354551, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SMOKE N LOCAL [email protected] 914-588-6544Serial 99354551 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Kyle Ellefsen
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Aug 24, 2025
The record shows that the mark “SMOKE N LOCAL” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant did not respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Kyle Ellefsen, a limited liability company organized in New York. The mark covered restaurant and hotel services under class 043, specifically providing food and drink via a mobile truck, with first use on May 15 2025 and use in commerce on June 1 2025. Because the mark is no longer active, it does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, but the closest concern would arise for businesses offering mobile food services or similar hospitality services. The prosecution history shows a standard Office action and abandonment sequence, with no evidence of enforcement activity. The last significant event was the abandonment notice on June 26 2026. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, yet the specific mobile food service context remains the most relevant area of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.