Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for IVORY BLOOM, serial 99375738, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
IVORY BLOOMSerial 99375738 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Zhangzhou Longwen District Zhishang Shenghua Trading Co., Ltd.
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed Sep 04, 2025
Registered Apr 07, 2026
The record shows that “IVORY BLOOM” is a live, registered mark on the Principal Register, owned by Zhangzhou Longwen District Zhishang Shenghua Trading Co., Ltd., a limited company organized in China. The mark protects a wide range of paper‑based goods, including printed greeting cards, paper labels, decorative paper centerpieces, gift wrapping paper, paper cake decorations, paper banners, paper table cloths, paper Halloween decorations, removable tattoo transfers, decals and stickers for home décor, paper gift tags, paper tissues, paper tapes, paper tubes, metallic paper party decorations, printed invitations, paper cake toppers, paper party decorations, paper mache statuettes, and party decorations made of paper. A similar name used for these or closely related paper products would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give control over every use of the wording, only the goods listed. The prosecution history shows a straightforward registration with no opposition or enforcement events. The latest status event is the April 7, 2026 registration confirmation. With no visible enforcement activity, the supplied history shows no current enforcement signals. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful concern for use in the same paper‑goods categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.