Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for WELLS FARGO, serial 99383123, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
WELLS FARGOSerial 99383123 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Wells Fargo & Company
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Sep 09, 2025
The record shows that the mark “WELLS FARGO” is currently pending on the Principal Register and is owned by Wells Fargo & Company, a Delaware corporation. The application covers a wide range of financial and technology services, including downloadable software for mobile financial transactions, cryptocurrency trading and wallet services, and software‑as‑a‑service platforms for tokenization and blockchain data management. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the areas of digital financial services and blockchain‑based software, where the goods and services overlap most closely with those listed. This record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “Wells Fargo” in all contexts. The latest status event is the Notice of Allowance issued on June 30, 2026, and the applicant must file a Statement of Use or an Extension Request within six months of that date. No oppositions, cancellations, or other enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For anyone considering a similar name, the pending status and broad coverage in financial technology suggest a meaningful risk of conflict if the name is used in related services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.