Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLUFFY POLLY, serial 99396015, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLUFFY POLLYSerial 99396015 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Fluffy Polly, LLC
Class 022 -
Filed Sep 16, 2025
The record shows that the mark “FLUFFY POLLY” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Fluffy Polly, LLC, a limited liability company organized in North Carolina. The mark was filed on September 16, 2025 under an intent‑to‑use basis for class 022, covering synthetic fibers for textile use, polyester fibers for textile use, polyester stuffing fibers, and polyester fibers. Because the mark is no longer active, it does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, but it does create a closer concern for any new mark that covers the same or very similar goods—synthetic or polyester fibers used in textiles. The prosecution history shows a normal examination sequence with an extension granted in May 2026 and a final abandonment notice in August 2026; no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the closest record‑based concern lies in the textile fiber market, and the abandoned status means the owner is not currently enforcing this mark.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.