Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PINK PONY CLUB, serial 99408598, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PINK PONY CLUBSerial 99408598 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Chippewa Properties, Inc.
Class 004 -
Class 014 -
Class 021 -
Class 026 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Sep 23, 2025
The record shows a live, pending application for the mark “PINK PONY CLUB” owned by Chippewa Properties, Inc., a Michigan corporation, and it is being examined on the Principal Register. The goods and services listed span several classes: candles (class 004); jewelry and lapel pins (class 014); mugs, tumblers and other drinking‑glass items (class 021); ornamental patches for clothing (class 026); and a broad retail‑store service offering a mix of household, kitchen, barware, toys, jewelry, printed matter, stickers, linens, golf balls, magnets, hair accessories, gift cards and other consumer merchandise (class 035). Because the application covers a wide retail‑store offering that includes many of the same product types, a similar name used for any of those categories would present the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give Chippewa Properties control over every possible use of the words “Pink Pony Club” in unrelated fields. The latest status event is an extension‑of‑time filing for opposition, noted on April 16 2026 after the mark was published for opposition on March 17 2026. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a similar name for comparable household, kitchen, toy or retail merchandise.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.