Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ORION A PRECISION ECONTROL PLATFORM, serial 99414244, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ORION A PRECISION ECONTROL PLATFORMSerial 99414244 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Sep 26, 2025
The record shows a live pending application for the service mark “ORION A PRECISION ECONTROL PLATFORM,” owned by Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP, a limited‑liability partnership organized in Ohio, and it is being examined on the Principal Register. The filing, made on September 26 2025, claims Class 042 services that include software‑as‑a‑service for managing brand‑seller relationships, monitoring product listings on e‑commerce sites, and enforcing against counterfeiting, policy violations and other illegal activities that affect sales and brand equity, plus related online computer services. Because the claim is limited to these technology‑focused services, a similar name used in a different field—say, clothing or restaurant services—would be farther from the scope shown here, though the record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “Orion,” “Precision,” or “Platform.” The most recent meaningful event is the issuance of a suspension letter on April 15 2026, which halted further prosecution; the supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name in the same SaaS‑monitoring space, but the risk is lower for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.