Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CHATGPT, serial 99419666, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CHATGPTSerial 99419666 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: OpenAI OpCo, LLC
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Sep 29, 2025
The record shows that the mark “CHATGPT” is currently pending on the Principal Register, owned by OpenAI OpCo, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The application was filed on September 29, 2025 and the most recent status update was a non‑final Office action sent on February 27, 2026, which requires the applicant to respond. The goods and services listed cover a wide range of software and technology offerings, including downloadable and interactive computer software, artificial‑intelligence training and development tools, advertising and business services, communication services, educational and entertainment services, scientific and technology services, and online social networking services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of these areas, especially where the goods or services overlap with AI‑based software or online services. The record does not grant control over every use of the wording, and no enforcement actions or cancellations appear in the supplied history. The next consequential date is not provided. For someone considering a similar name, the pending status and broad scope of goods and services suggest a meaningful risk of conflict.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.