Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NINJA WARRIOR, serial 99428821, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NINJA WARRIORSerial 99428821 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Tokyo Broadcasting System Television, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Oct 06, 2025
The record shows a live, pending application for the mark NINJA WARRIOR owned by Tokyo Broadcasting System Television, Inc., a limited corporation organized in Japan, and it is being pursued on the Principal Register under an intent‑to‑use basis. The goods listed are all in International Class 009 and focus on downloadable video‑game and virtual‑reality software, such as “Downloadable video game programs; Downloadable video game software; Downloadable co‑op video game software; Recorded computer virtual reality game software; Downloadable virtual reality game software; Downloadable interactive multimedia computer game programs.” Because the claim is limited to these types of software, a similar name used for unrelated products—say clothing or food—would be farther from the scope shown here, though the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Ninja” or “Warrior.” The latest meaningful event is the issuance of a Notice of Allowance on May 5 2026, which now requires a Statement of Use or an extension within six months. The prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions, so the supplied history shows none. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a video‑game or VR product with a similar name, because the record directly covers that market segment.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.