Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FISHWIFE, serial 99453921, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FISHWIFESerial 99453921 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Fisch-Witte GmbH & Co. KG
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 031 -
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Oct 21, 2025
The record shows that the mark “FISHWIFE” is currently pending under examination on the Principal Register, owned by Fisch‑Witte GmbH & Co. KG, a German entity. The application covers tableware, cookware and containers; clothing, headgear, shoes and parts of clothing; a wide range of meats, fish, poultry, processed foods and related preparations; agricultural products and live animals; and restaurant and hotel services such as food and drink provision and catering. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of those goods or services, especially where the mark is used for food, beverages, or related apparel. The record does not grant control over every use of the word “fishwife.” The prosecution history shows a non‑final Office action issued on April 4, 2026, with the applicant still required to respond; no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. The latest event is the non‑final action, and the next consequential date would be the response deadline, which is not provided. For someone considering a similar name, the pending status and broad goods and services list suggest a meaningful risk of conflict in those areas.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.