Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for BLOOMING SALON, serial 99488171, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BLOOMING SALON
Serial 99488171 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: NAILS BY LIZ
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Nov 10, 2025

The record shows that the mark “BLOOMING SALON” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant, NAILS BY LIZ, a Texas limited liability company, failed to respond to an Office action. The mark was filed on November 10, 2025 and the abandonment was recorded on July 13, 2026. The mark was applied for on the Principal Register under class 044, covering nail care salons. Because the mark is no longer active, it does not give the owner control over the wording in any other context, but the record does indicate that a similar name could raise the closest concern for nail‑care or beauty‑service businesses. The prosecution history shows a straightforward sequence of office actions and a final abandonment, with no opposition, cancellation, or court proceeding recorded. Since the supplied history contains no enforcement activity, the owner has not demonstrated any enforcement of the mark. For someone considering a similar name, the main risk is that the abandoned mark still signals that the owner once sought protection for nail‑care services, so using a very similar name in that same field could still be viewed as potentially infringing.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search