Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GROOVYLOVE, serial 99513318, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GROOVYLOVESerial 99513318 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: The iTreeware Group, LLC
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Nov 24, 2025
The record shows that GROOVYLOVE is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it “dead” after the applicant, The iTreeware Group, LLC, failed to answer a non‑final office action, resulting in an abandonment notice on July 14 2026. The filing covered only Class 025 clothing, listing items such as jogging pants, mountaineering boots, children’s headwear, bathing suits, smart clothing with wireless or bio‑chip sensors, crochet tops, hiking shoes, sports jerseys, pleated skirts, bucket hats, fleece jackets, corsets, tube tops, shawls, cover‑ups, embroidered shirts, jackets, pants, sweats, hoodies, yoga tops and bottoms, and related apparel. Because the claim is limited to apparel, a similar name used for unrelated goods – say software, food, or services – would be farther from the scope shown here, though the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “groovylove.” The latest meaningful event is the abandonment on July 14 2026, and the prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so no enforcement signal appears. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a clothing line with a similar name, since the abandoned filing still signals that the USPTO once saw a potential conflict in that market.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.