Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ROBERT & ETHEL KENNEDY HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER, serial 99517463, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ROBERT & ETHEL KENNEDY HUMAN RIGHTS CENTERSerial 99517463 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: ROBERT AND ETHEL KENNEDY HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Nov 26, 2025
The record shows a live pending application for the service mark ROBERT & ETHEL KENNEDY HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER, owned by the non‑profit corporation ROBERT AND ETHEL KENNEDY HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER, filed on Nov 26 2025 and currently under examination on the Principal Register. The goods and services listed span class 035 advertising and business (promoting awareness of ethical technology and human‑rights issues), class 036 charitable fundraising for human‑rights advocacy, class 041 education (workshops, conferences, curriculum, and thought‑leadership on human‑rights, diversity, equity, inclusion and ethical technology), and class 045 legal and personal services (non‑profit advocacy, litigation, and government‑accountability work). A similar name used for activities in those areas would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those fields are farther from the scope shown. The latest meaningful event is a final refusal mailed on Aug 5 2026, and the prosecution history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name in the same nonprofit‑human‑rights space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.