Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ORYON ACCORD, serial 99538306, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ORYON ACCORDSerial 99538306 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: OURA.1 Corporation
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Dec 09, 2025
The record shows a live, pending application for the mark ORYON ACCORD owned by OURA.1 Corporation, a Texas corporation, and it is slated for the Principal Register. The goods are “downloadable cloud‑based software for use as a personal artificial intelligence assistant, namely, providing personality‑based insights, goal tracking, productivity planning, habit support, and virtual coaching” (class 009) and “software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for personalized productivity workflows, scheduling reminders, and analyzing user behavior” (class 042). A similar name used for AI‑driven productivity or coaching software would be the closest area of concern because the listed services focus on personalized AI assistance and workflow management. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “ORYON” or “ACCORD.” The latest meaningful event is the Notice of Allowance issued on July 7, 2026, which now requires a Statement of Use or an extension within six months. The prosecution history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I’d treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable AI‑based productivity product.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.