Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for THE NAME "CONSUMER ACTION FOR A STRONG ECONOMY" AND AS SHORTENED TO THE ACRONYM CASE AS IT SPECIFICALLY REFERS TO "CONSUMER ACTION FOR A STRONG ECONOMY", serial 99570882, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
THE NAME "CONSUMER ACTION FOR A STRONG ECONOMY" AND AS SHORTENED TO THE ACRONYM CASE AS IT SPECIFICALLY REFERS TO "CONSUMER ACTION FOR A STRONG ECONOMY"Serial 99570882 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: GERARD DANIEL SCIMECA
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Dec 30, 2025
The record shows the application for “THE NAME ‘CONSUMER ACTION FOR A STRONG ECONOMY’ AND AS SHORTENED TO THE ACRONYM CASE AS IT SPECIFICALLY REFERS TO ‘CONSUMER ACTION FOR A STRONG ECONOMY’” is dead; it was refused and void because the filing date did not meet the minimum requirement, with the status dated April 21 2026 and the owner listed as Gerard Daniel Scimeca, an individual. The only listed class is 035 – Advertising & Business – covering “promoting, advertising and marketing of the brands, products, services and online websites of individuals, businesses and nonprofit organizations.” A similar name used in that advertising‑oriented context would be the closest area of concern, but the record does not give the owner control over every other use of the wording. The prosecution history contains only the filing receipt and entry on December 30 2025, and no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market similar advertising services under a comparable phrase.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.