Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for JUST BECAUSE, serial 99596411, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
JUST BECAUSESerial 99596411 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Brittany Hazzard
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Jan 15, 2026
The record shows a live pending application for the mark JUST BECAUSE owned by Brittany Hazzard, filed on Jan 15 2026 and currently on the Principal Register; the latest status update is a request for an extension of time to file an opposition entered on Jul 7 2026 after the mark was published for opposition on Jun 9 2026. The application covers three classes: Class 009 for musical sound recordings, downloadable audio and video files, and related multimedia; Class 025 for clothing such as tops, bottoms, headwear, footwear, jackets, socks, belts and athletic apparel; and Class 041 for entertainment services including music production, songwriting, live performances, music publishing and non‑downloadable music videos. A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern in the music‑related goods and services of Classes 009 and 041, with a secondary concern in the apparel listed in Class 025. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “just because.” No prosecution history entries or cancellations appear, and the supplied history shows no enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name in music, video or clothing contexts.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.