Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BOND GIRL, serial 99607953, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BOND GIRLSerial 99607953 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: London Operations, LLC
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 010 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Jan 21, 2026
The record shows a pending application for the mark BOND GIRL owned by London Operations, LLC, filed on Jan 21 2026, and the latest event is a final Office refusal dated Aug 5 2026, which means the USPTO has not granted registration and the application is currently dead‑ended unless the applicant successfully appeals or files a reconsideration. The goods and services listed span a wide range, including non‑medicated cosmetics, cleaning preparations, electrical and scientific apparatus, eyewear accessories, paper and printed matter, household utensils, clothing, toys and games, education and entertainment services, and restaurant and hotel services. A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern if used for any of those categories, especially the cosmetics, clothing, or entertainment services where the wording appears most directly tied to the mark’s description. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of “BOND GIRL” outside these listed areas. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action in May 2026 followed by a final refusal in August 2026, but there are no entries indicating oppositions, cancellations, or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for anyone planning to use a comparable name in the same product or service fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.