Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ROBERT THE DOLL, serial 99610948, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ROBERT THE DOLLSerial 99610948 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Key West Art & Historical Society, Inc.
Class 004 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 026 -
Class 028 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Jan 23, 2026
The record shows a live pending application for “ROBERT THE DOLL” owned by Key West Art & Historical Society, Inc., and it is currently published for opposition as of July 21 2026. The goods and services span a wide range, including candles (Class 004), magnets and digital media featuring folklore and paranormal stories (Class 009), key‑chain charms (Class 014), printed children’s books and dolls sold as a unit, posters, stickers and coasters (Class 016), tote bags (Class 018), various drinkware and lunch‑related items (Class 021), shirts, t‑shirts and sweatshirts (Class 025), novelty buttons and ornamental patches (Class 026), plush and plastic dolls, puzzles, ornaments and board games (Class 028), online retail and brick‑and‑mortar store services for related merchandise (Class 035), and museum and multimedia production services (Class 041). A similar name used in any of those categories would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those descriptions are not covered by this filing. The prosecution history shows the application was approved for publication on the Principal Register and then entered the opposition window; it does not indicate a Supplemental Register filing. The latest meaningful event is the July 21 2026 publication for opposition, and the supplied history contains no visible enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name in the listed goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.