Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GLAMA GIRL LUXURY, serial 99611677, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GLAMA GIRL LUXURYSerial 99611677 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Andrea Dixon
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Jan 23, 2026
Registered Aug 18, 2026
The record shows that “GLAMA GIRL LUXURY” is a live, Principal Register service mark owned by Andrea Dixon, an individual, and it was registered on August 18 2026 after filing on January 23 2026. The registration covers Class 035 services – specifically business consultancy, advertising, marketing and promotion services – so a later use of the same wording in those kinds of commercial consulting or promotional activities would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “GLAMA,” “GIRL” or “LUXURY,” especially outside the listed services. The prosecution history shows the application cleared an examiner’s amendment on June 3 2026 and proceeded to registration without a Supplemental Register filing, indicating the USPTO found the mark acceptable for the Principal Register. The most recent status event is the Notice of Registration Confirmation emailed on August 18 2026, and no opposition or cancellation activity appears in the history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a similar name for business‑consulting or advertising services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.