Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for RAYLAND, serial 99612705, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
RAYLANDSerial 99612705 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Shanghai Rilang Doors and Windows Co., Ltd.
Class 006 -
Filed Jan 24, 2026
The record shows that the mark “RAYLAND” is currently pending on the Principal Register, owned by Shanghai Rilang Doors and Windows Co., Ltd., a limited company organized in China. The application was filed on January 24, 2026 and the Notice of Allowance was issued on August 18, 2026, meaning the applicant must file a Statement of Use or an Extension Request within six months of that date. The goods covered are metal doors, metal door panels, metal door frames, metal windows, metal window frames, metal jalousies, metal fences, revolving metal doors, metal greenhouses, and prefabricated metal houses. A similar name would raise the closest concern for products or services in the metal door and window manufacturing and installation space. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “RAYLAND.” No enforcement activity such as oppositions or cancellations appears in the supplied history. The next consequential date is the six‑month deadline for filing a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance. For someone considering a similar name, the presence of a pending mark in the same product category suggests a meaningful risk of confusion or legal challenge.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.