Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for IMA INFORMATION MARKETS ASSOCIATION, serial 99616085, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
IMA INFORMATION MARKETS ASSOCIATIONSerial 99616085 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Jan 26, 2026
The record shows that the mark “IMA INFORMATION MARKETS ASSOCIATION” is currently pending on the Principal Register, owned by Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP. The mark covers services in classes 035 and 041, specifically promoting business interests through public advocacy in information markets, providing market research and intelligence, and offering educational conferences, seminars, and non‑downloadable webinars in the same field. A similar name would raise the closest concern for uses that involve business advocacy, market research, or educational services related to information markets. This record does not give control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the scope listed. The prosecution history indicates a Notice of Allowance was issued on August 18, 2026, and the applicant must file a Statement of Use or Extension Request within six months. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. If you’re considering a similar name, be aware that this pending mark could create a meaningful concern for related services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.