Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG 3.3D CUBE-T, serial 99642884, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNG 3.3D CUBE-TSerial 99642884 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 040 -
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Feb 09, 2026
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG 3.3D CUBE‑T” is currently pending under examination on the Principal Register, owned by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., a corporation organized in Korea. The application covers electrical and scientific apparatus in class 009—semiconductors, semiconductor components, memories, integrated circuits, and multiprocessor chips—as well as semiconductor and integrated‑circuit foundry services in class 040 and research, design, and testing services related to semiconductors in class 042. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these specific semiconductor‑related goods and services, especially where the mark is used for manufacturing or testing of semiconductor components. The record does not give Samsung control over every use of the wording in unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows a non‑final office action was issued on June 9, 2026, and the applicant must respond; no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the current pending status and the specific semiconductor focus suggest a meaningful risk of conflict in that industry.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.