Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG 2.3D CUBE-E, serial 99644886, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNG 2.3D CUBE-ESerial 99644886 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 040 -
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Feb 10, 2026
The record shows a live, pending application on the Principal Register owned by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., filed on February 10 2026 and currently marked “Applicant’s response to a non‑final Office action has been entered” as of September 8 2026. The goods and services listed focus on semiconductor‑related items and services – everything from semiconductor packaging platforms, chips, wafers and substrates to wafer‑level processing, custom manufacturing, and technology research, design and consulting for semiconductor packaging and integrated circuits in classes 009, 040 and 042. Because the coverage is narrowly tied to those high‑tech semiconductor products and services, a similar name used in a very different field would be farther from the record’s scope, but a name applied to any semiconductor‑related offering could raise a meaningful concern. The record does not give Samsung control over every possible use of the words “SAMSUNG 2.3D CUBE‑E.” The prosecution history shows a non‑final action was issued in June 2026 and the applicant responded in September 2026, but there are no listed oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a notable concern if you plan a mark in the semiconductor arena.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.