Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for TEST INNOVATORS, serial 99659668, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
TEST INNOVATORSSerial 99659668 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Test Innovators, Inc.
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Feb 18, 2026
The record shows that “TEST INNOVATORS” is a pending service mark owned by Test Innovators, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and it is currently published for opposition on the Principal Register. The mark covers a range of educational and technology services, specifically online educational testing services, college entrance exam preparation webinars, AI software design for test preparation, and related tutoring and assessment services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the areas of online test preparation and AI‑driven educational software, because those are the goods and services listed. The record does not give the mark control over every use of the word “TEST” or “INNOVATORS” in unrelated contexts. The prosecution history shows that the examiner approved the mark for publication on July 28, 2026, and the most recent event is the publication for opposition on August 25, 2026. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the presence of a pending mark in closely related services suggests a meaningful risk of confusion or legal challenge if the name is used in those same or similar fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.