Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CRAVITY AI, serial 99701467, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CRAVITY AISerial 99701467 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: MENUSIFU INC.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Mar 13, 2026
The record shows that “CRAVITY AI” is a pending application on the Principal Register owned by MENUSIFU INC. The mark covers downloadable computer software and mobile applications for voice‑based food and beverage ordering, AI and machine learning tools for restaurant operations, and related SaaS services, as well as business data analysis, consulting, and marketing services for restaurants. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the food‑service technology and analytics space, especially where the goods or services involve AI‑powered ordering or customer‑behavior analysis. This record does not grant control over every use of the wording; it is limited to the listed classes and services. The prosecution history shows the mark was approved for publication, entered into the Principal Register, and then published for opposition on August 18, 2026, with no enforcement actions recorded. The next consequential date would be the end of the opposition period, but that date is not supplied. For someone considering a similar name, the presence of this pending mark in the restaurant‑technology field suggests a meaningful risk of conflict.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.