Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for IACON BEAUTY, serial 99724994, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
IACON BEAUTYSerial 99724994 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Ashley Iaconetti
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Filed Mar 25, 2026
The record shows that the mark “IACON BEAUTY” is currently pending on the Principal Register, owned by Ashley Iaconetti, a limited liability company organized in Rhode Island. The application was filed on March 25, 2026 and the latest status update is a non‑final Office action sent on August 12, 2026, meaning the examiner has raised issues that the applicant must address before registration can proceed. The goods listed are an extensive range of non‑medicated skin‑care preparations, cosmetics, and related products, including creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners, peels, and makeup items for skin, hair, and scalp. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the cosmetics and personal‑care sector, especially for products that are non‑medicated and natural or organic. This record does not grant control over every use of the wording; it only covers the specific goods listed. The prosecution history shows the application was assigned to an examiner and an Office action was issued, but no enforcement actions or cancellations appear. The next consequential date is not provided in the record. For someone considering a similar name, the pending status and broad cosmetics coverage suggest a meaningful risk of similarity in that market.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.