Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SCARY BABOON, serial 99771913, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SCARY BABOONSerial 99771913 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Enver Studio LLC
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Apr 17, 2026
The record shows a live, pending application for the mark SCARY BABOON owned by Enver Studio LLC, a Wyoming limited‑liability company, and it is being examined on the Principal Register. The applicant is seeking protection for a range of video‑game‑related offerings—including downloadable and multiplayer virtual‑reality game software, online multiplayer video games, and related entertainment services—as well as for physical merchandise such as stickers, posters, notebooks, mugs, apparel, plush toys, action figures, board games and trading cards. Because the listed goods and services focus on gaming, digital entertainment and related consumer products, a similar name used in those same categories would create the closest record‑based concern; uses outside those areas would be farther from the scope shown here. The latest status event is a non‑final Office action dated July 23 2026, which means the USPTO has asked for additional information or raised an initial refusal that must be answered. The prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement signals, so the supplied history shows none. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a gaming‑related brand with a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.