Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CREST&SOUL, serial 99881982, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CREST&SOULSerial 99881982 · Principal Register
Pending · Awaiting Examination
Owner: Dewu Zhai
Class 026 -
Filed Jun 12, 2026
The record shows that the mark “CREST&SOUL” is currently pending, with the owner listed as Dewu Zhai, an individual. The application was filed on June 12, 2026 and is awaiting examination, so no registration has yet been granted. The goods listed are artificial floral arrangements, artificial flowers of textile, artificial vegetables, decorative backpack charms, decorative charms for cell phones, hair ornaments such as hair wraps, hair pins and grips, hair slides, ornamental novelty pins, ornamental ribbons made of textiles, permanent botanicals in the nature of artificial flowers and plants other than Christmas trees, pet collar accessories like charms, ponytail holders and hair ribbons, purse charms, and knitting kits that include knitting needles, crochet hooks, yarn, and printed crochet diagrams. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these areas of decorative or textile accessories and artificial plant items. The record does not give control over every use of the wording; it only covers the goods listed. The prosecution history shows only the filing and receipt of the application, with no opposition or cancellation events. Because the record shows no enforcement activity, the supplied history contains none. If you are thinking of using a similar name for products in these categories, this record suggests a meaningful concern that you should evaluate further.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.