Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for KONICHIWA, serial 99945926, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
KONICHIWASerial 99945926 · Principal Register
Pending · Awaiting Examination
Owner: Constant Click LLC
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 010 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Jul 17, 2026
The record shows a live pending application for the mark KONICHIWA filed by Constant Click LLC, a Florida limited‑liability company, and it is currently awaiting assignment to an examining attorney after the filing receipt was mailed on July 17, 2026. The application covers a broad slate of goods and services, most notably non‑medicated men’s skin‑care and grooming products, a range of nutritional and pharmaceutical supplements (including those for sexual performance and testosterone support), downloadable health‑related software, wearable medical monitors, apparel, food and beverage items, online retail and subscription services, and various medical‑ and wellness‑related services. Because the listed items span cosmetics, health supplements, software, clothing and food, a similar name used in any of those areas would create the closest record‑based concern; uses outside those categories are farther from the scope shown but are not automatically free of risk. The prosecution history contains only the initial filing receipt and entry, with no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement signals visible. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name in any of the covered classes, since the pending application could later mature into a registrable right.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.